In the palette of combineable qualities or settings, already with only two factors, our possible deepening is unbelievable or hard to imagine.

Mercy: In that we have nothing but understanding for whatever action of the other, even if it may come from the total lack of understanding of him. This may even lead to the more seldom levels of uninterpretable or ill action. Our understanding is just a phase of mercy itself, within that we have full excuse for errors or self-misguidance of the individual, as a form of love's activity. Mercy as a feeling can act as the resoluting counterpart of the non-understandable; it is the movement towards love.

Approach a problem with the feeling of mercy, to feel its potentialities.

In the special instance, a moment, a wonderful, hesitating "jiffy" - I have felt a future in the "now". I feel how far my inner sensory mechanisms help me to instantly translate the outer moment into conceivability: highly selective content, broadly displayed as its original quality. It feels like knowing something, before to think of it. Knowing something... directly.

What does now happen, (or, in the suggestion of a typo: what does not happen) when I watch my love, my darling, with these two special qualities, happenings, settings... on the stage of mind, with no viewers or actors but the two of us?

Do I feel that she suggests her content (topics, moods and substances of communicative exchange) - but does not easily wish for mine? What, if I agreed to her content - but swallowed mine for "some other" communication? How would she then react, when I tried to communicate mine - and if she reacted towards it (what i cannot believe) - why do I still feel alone?

In these surroundings, this time, even in Mercy and in the merciful allowance of Intuition as a Master Spirit, I have to say, and I can say: She did not see my inside; she maybe... fell in love.

What a hard kind of insight. How alone do I feel now? Mercy is here... how could she have known, have acted better. If she just could do it, knew how to value a soul space that still must be hidden to her (otherwise she would enjoy communication with me here), - she would be by my side...

After forgiving her - one of the qualitatively related actions of Mercy - should I try to manipulate my "content" about her? No. Should I try to suggest a different way to her? Not more than once. So, no more. Should I try to make an early start into communicative fulfillment?

As long as I can imagine its existence, it must be "out there / in here". Her response to my movements here may be noticeable; but what she cannot talk to, this she cannot guide: It seems to be situated in the Unqualified Absolute. So where do I search, staying-being clearly eye-to-eye with her, without that I let myself be misguided by my thought (and "content") of her simple presence? Where else am I?

Love cannot lie togetherness; it cannot lie. But it will show up every time we look for it; it cannot be absent. We may think to see absence, if we want to shape it; but what is absent is not Love.

Should I now try to make an early start into communicative fulfillment?

Here it is.